In this article I am going to discuss the various Canon lenses that are
available to bird photographers and the pros and cons of each.
We'll begin with the 2 lenses that many bird photographers start out
with and work our way up. While there are other lenses that may
work for birds in the Canon lineup I am going to concentrate on lenses
that can supply a quality 400mm or more. When you are working with
birds reach is essential. Another essential component of most bird
photography is auto focus speed. If your lens is searching
endlessly for focus you'll never get a shot.
First I'll discuss the 'starter' bird lenses. These range in
price from about $1000-$1300 in price
Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 IS L Zoom lens -
This is a lens I used for approx. 2 years and it made a very good lens
for capturing birds and other wildlife. The general problem for birds is
that unless you are taking photos of relatively large and/or tame birds
you will find yourself using this lens at the 400mm end most of the
Pros: Relatively lightweight, convenient zoom, Has IS, good optical
quality for a zoom.
Cons: Doesn't take a extender very well, has slow 5.6 aperture on
400mm end, is a little soft at the 400mm end where used most for
birding, has a slower auto focus speed compared to other prime
lenses in this article.
Recommended for bird photogs who: Want to use the lens for other
larger wildlife or purposes or are primarily using it for larger or
tamer birds that can be approached closely. This is a entry
level lens or a addition to a serious bird photographers kit.
Canon 400mm 5.6 L lens - This lens is
currently in my arsenal and I use it mainly now for a birds in flight
lens on a second camera body. This is generally the lens I
recommend to most beginner bird photographers.
Pros: Very sharp lens with one of the fastest auto focus speeds
around. Small for it's 400mm reach. This lens can take a
1.4XTC resulting in 560mm and maintain great sharpness and focus speed
** . This is a excellent bird in flight lens which can be kept if you
graduate to longer glass in the future.
Cons: Doesn't have IS so this lens needs good light or will need to
be tripod mounted for best results. With a 5.6 aperture you will
be limited to slow shutter speeds or high ISO's in less than ideal
Recommended for bird photogs who: Are starting out and want super
image quality and auto focus speed in a small package that won't break
the bank. Generally if you want one lens just for birds than this
Canon Super Tele Lenses - These lenses are the bread and butter of
serious bird photographers but are very pricey and range from
Canon 300mm 2.8 IS L lens - This lens is
a excellent all around performer and can be pressed into service as a
420mm or 600mm with 1.4 and 2.0 Teleconverters. It is currently my
preferred lens when travel space is at a premium and I want a versatile
Pros: Takes both the 1.4 and 2.0 extenders VERY well and has
the fastest auto focus speed of any Canon lens. This is also one
of the sharpest lenses made. It is also the smallest format to get
a useable 600mm focal length.
Cons: Generally for bird photography 300mm doesn't cut it so this
lens will be used almost entirely with extenders for bird photography.
Recommended for bird photogs who: Are serious about their bird
photography and want one of the most versatile and travel friendly
lenses in the Canon arsenal which provides the very best image quality.
Canon 500mm and 600mm f/4 IS L lenses -
These are the bread and butter lenses of all professional bird
photographers. These lenses currently make up the majority of my
bird photos. The real consideration between these 2 lenses is
portability and size. The 600mm is difficult to travel on airlines
with because of the size of the bag required to hold it. The 500mm
makes a much better airline travel lens. While both lenses can be
handheld by a well bodied man for a few shot really neither lens is at
home on anything less than a good solid tripod. The 600mm gives
you a image that has 44% more pixels on target (20 % horiz x 20% vert).
Both lenses shine on a gimbal type head such as a Wimberley. In
general I would recommend the 500mm for a great all around wildlife lens
with a emphasis on birds. For specializing in small birds lof
warbler size or birds on impoundments in the distance the 600mm is much
preferred. Realistically for carrying into the field mounted on a
tripod the difference between the 2 lenses is not of primary concern.
The weight difference of the 2 lenses is approx. 3 pounds. When
carried into the field on a 25-30 pound pro rig the weight difference is
only about 10-15%.
Pros: The best 2 Canon bird lenses made. Perfect image quality
and super fast auto focus speed. Both lenses take the 1.4 extender
very well and both take the 2.0 extender ** very well on a 1 series pro
Cons: High cost, weight and portability.
Recommended for bird photogs who: Want the best pro quality lenses on
** Canon cameras such as the 20D, 30D, Rebels and 5D will lose auto
focus ability on apertures greater than f/5.6. Canon 1 series
bodies can still auto focus at apertures of f/8 using the center focus